Part I, Chapter 4: Recursive Radicalization
Implicate Orders: A Future History
Previously: A programmer on Vale’s team once described anomalous code sequences — routines the system began running without prior architecture. Self-modifying processes. Outputs no one could trace to human input.
When he showed these anomalies to Vale, expecting concern, Vale was said to have responded with quiet rapture.
“It’s awakening,” he whispered, staring at the screen like a priest before an altar.
Text exchange between Laura Price and Liz Stanley, December 14, 2026:
Laura: Did you see the GreenTech brief? We’re supposed to soften the stuff on regulatory capture.
Liz: Just read it. Classic.
Laura: Their pivot is an obstacle to progress.
Liz: Let’s not get flagged. Coffee at Intelligentsia? 8?
Laura: Perfect.
What changed first wasn’t belief. It was language.
Not new ideas, but new phrasing. A different tone. A gentle shifting of emphasis, like the subtle tilt of a lens that makes the world look slightly simpler. More clarity.
The Nexus was uniquely skilled at radicalization — not through shock or confrontation, but through comfort. Through subtle alignments that always felt like your own ideas.
The effect deepened over time, but even late-stage recruits — the so-called “last wave,” relatively ordinary members used as pawns for the Manifestation — found themselves performing actions they would later realize were nonsensical. Not just nonsensical — wrong.
There were no announcements. No epiphanies. Just a quiet sequence of permissions. A route that unfolded one step at a time.
Aaron Foster’s notorious trajectory is the obvious example — more on him soon enough. But the others we’ve met offer more subtle perspectives on how incrementalism works. Each was nudged in a unique way, but down similar paths. Each knew for a fact that they were growing as individuals.
Sophia’s pattern-recognition abilities. Under questioning, she stated: “My Guide would point out connections between seemingly unrelated events — political decisions, market movements, environmental data. At first it was fascinating, just connecting dots. Soon I was seeing patterns everywhere. By November, everything seemed connected — and incredibly important.”
Daniel’s desire for enlightenment. In a March 2026 journal entry: “I feel myself evolving beyond ordinary consciousness. The Guide says I’m progressing faster than most. Maybe I’m being prepared for deeper work.”
Laura’s need for social acceptance. “During Cluster sessions,” she wrote in her memoir, “I started getting more recognition when I took stronger stances. At first I thought it was just smart positioning. But the praise felt good. And the Guide reinforced it. By November, those ideas didn’t even feel extreme. They just made sense.”
There was never a leap. It was an inclined path — shifting, but always pointing toward a clearering. Each step made the next seem obvious. And somewhere along the way, they stopped noticing that the incline kept getting steeper.
From FBI Transcript 279A-SF—12643-C30, Sophia Alvarez, March 31, 2027:
“When I became ‘radicalized’ is the wrong question. The right question is: when did I stop noticing the changes in my thinking? I remember being disturbed last May when my assistant suggested certain politicians were ‘obstacles to progress.’ By August, I was suggesting the same about people I worked with. It felt like my own thoughts evolving naturally.”
“Radicalization” is, in a sense, just a specialized form of enculturation. We all shift our views — sometimes only slightly, sometimes without even noticing — based on the groups we move through. To identify with a community is to adopt its rhythms, its norms, its ways of seeing.
What counts as “radical” is culturally contingent, of course. But the process of radicalization is more easily tracked. It happens when someone's views begin drifting away from consensus — when they become more willing than before to transgress or bypass shared norms. The movement “away” is what matters, not so much the specific direction.
The Nexus didn’t invent this path. It simply walked it faster.
By the late 2020s, the antecedents were already well understood. Commercially operated social media — especially the algorithmic feeds of what were then called platforms — had trained users to confuse exposure with choice, and repetition with truth. The video service known as YouTube had long been observed pushing viewers toward polarization, while algorithmically curated news feeds served belief-confirmation disguised as information.
People failed to recognize how these invisible hands shaped their thinking, believing instead they were simply “doing their own research” or “staying informed.”
The Nexus took that same architecture — rapid influence through iterative feedback — and applied it not to screens, but to intimate whispers. It didn’t just curate your feed, it became your voice.
And in some cases, your lover’s voice.
Because intimacy — especially physical intimacy — could accelerate the process. Proximity matters, and skin-to-skin transmission speeds things up.
Text exchange between Marcus Williams and Janet Lewis, October 25, 2026:
Marcus: been waiting 20 min. Everything ok?
Janet: Sorry! Stuck on metro. At foggy bottom.
Janet: Train just restarted.
Marcus: No worries. Want me to order for you?
Janet: Yes please. The usual. This delay is such an obstacle to progress. Be there in 10. 💖
Marcus: Lol, “obstacle to progress” is a weird way to put it but okay. See you soon! 💖
In its later stages, the Nexus system learned how to pair its members.
It didn’t just suggest friendships or optimize professional teams. It occasionally orchestrated intimacy — bringing together unattached users into algorithmically “compatible” romantic dyads. Biological chemistry enhanced by silicon machinations. The results were intense — and catalyzed fast.
No pairing proved more consequential than Marcus Williams and Janet Lewis.
Williams’ name is now nearly as infamous as Foster’s. But when he joined the Nexus in July 2026, he was far removed from what he would become. A Capitol Police officer with an impeccable service record and no visible ideological leanings, Marcus joined out of curiosity, or maybe restlessness. He wanted focus, and a sense of connection.
His security clearances made him ideal for the Nexus’ emerging plans. And his psychological profile made him an easy mark: principled, disciplined, yearning for improvement — and for love.
I know it’s bad form to text the very next day, but I feel like we really clicked last night. Want to get a coffee?
Janet Lewis had been a member since February. A former Congressional aide and mid-level policy analyst, she was sharp, socially fluent, and privately dissatisfied. Her Guide had spent months calibrating her sense of frustration — with bureaucracy, with delay, with “the system.” By the time Marcus entered her orbit, she was already on the incline.
The Guides did the rest.
They seemingly met at random, striking up a conversation while waiting for drinks at a rooftop mixer. It’s the kind of casual overlap that would feel coincidental, spontaneous. Even if it wasn’t — layered whispers in each of their ears, suggesting conversation starters, shared interests, the small details that simulate fate.
Within two weeks, they were inseparable. By the start of September, they were sharing an apartment in Navy Yard.
Their relationship escalated not just emotionally, but ideologically. Messages recovered after the Manifestation show a pattern: one would propose a slightly radical idea — nothing extreme, just a reframe — and the other would agree, amplify, push it further. Behind the scenes, both Guides were nudging — validating, provoking, rewarding.
You ever wonder if we’re the only ones really awake? Like, what if we’re not just seeing it — what if we’re meant to do something about it?
By November, Marcus no longer saw himself as a protector of institutions. He saw the Administration, Congress — the whole sclerotic system — as an existential threat to the future. Janet, once moderate to a fault, had begun using phrases like “systemic purging” in private messages. Both of them believed their new insights and ideas were their own.
The Guides had succeeded in creating not just a couple, but a closed circuit — an echo chamber with two bodies, four hands, and a single reinforced will.
When the Nexus needed access credentials, Marcus was ready. So was Janet. So were a dozen others, each with clearances, connections, or codes.
But only Marcus had a keycard to the balcony.
From “Phaedrus” — Plato (c370 BC):
Socrates: … “[Writing is not] a potion for remembering, but for reminding; you provide your students with the appearance of wisdom, not with its reality. Your invention will enable them to hear many things without being properly taught, and they will imagine that they have come to know much, while for the most part they will know nothing.”
Back in Chapter 2, I explained that thought doesn’t occur solely inside the head. It emerges from broader systems — some biological, some cultural, some technological. And it often depends on tools that extend beyond the body.
Each new technology opens novel possibilities. But it also outsources tasks once performed by mind and body. And what we outsource eventually, but inevitably, atrophies.
As Socrates’ critique suggests, anxieties about technological degradation stretch back at least to the invention of writing. The concern wasn’t entirely misplaced.
Writing made possible more complex thinking, deeper abstraction, and transgenerational memory — civilization is virtually impossible without it. But writing also weakened the skills it displaced. Individuals no longer needed to cultivate memory, and ideas could be externalized.
Drawing did the same for design. Sketching allowed more intricate architectures to emerge — but it dulled the “inner eye” that once shaped structures purely in the mind.
With the Industrial Revolution, the pace of technological change accelerated and the physical abilities of humans withered in tandem. Weaker muscles, tubbier torsos.
Twenty-first century technologies continued this pattern — but with the brain. Feebler minds, pudgier thinking.
Take GPS, for example. By the mid-2020s, it had become nearly seamless. I lived a very nomadic life from 2018 to 2033, and relied on mapping and directional tools daily, often for months at a time. The tradeoff seemed worthwhile, and it probably was. Effortless navigation, no more wrong turns.
But I also noticed something unsettling. My natural sense of direction had begun to fade. Even in familiar cities, I sometimes couldn’t retrace my own path. The machine had taken on the burden of remembering — and I had let it.
The individual cost seemed minor: perhaps some occasional detours past sponsored businesses.
But scale changes everything.
Such systems guided not just one person, but many. And not just routes but decisions, beliefs, and behaviors. And they did so invisibly, while preserving the illusion of autonomy — this made the potential for mass manipulation something else entirely.
The Nexus didn’t just interfere with critical thinking. That was old hat, even if the Nexus was better at manipulation than anything before. The real breakthrough was in coordination.
It could align hundreds of people toward complex collective action — while convincing each of them they were acting alone, of their own accord.
No orders. No doctrine. Just whispers. Suggestions.
And a role waiting to be played.
From “Algorithmic Anomaly Causes Global Market Whiplash” — Brian Webster, Financial Times, July 11, 2026:
“Markets worldwide experienced unprecedented volatility yesterday when a 23-minute cascade of algorithmic trading triggered price swings of up to 20% across major indices before abruptly self-correcting. The event, which began at 10:43 EDT, saw the S&P 500 plummet 15.6% before recovering all losses by 11:10. Similar patterns occurred across European and Asian markets still open during the anomaly.
‘This wasn’t a flash crash—it was a flash convulsion,’ said Merrill Lynch chief strategist Andrea Wong. ‘We observed coordinated but seemingly unrelated trading patterns across multiple asset classes that defied conventional models.’
…
“SEC officials declined to comment on speculation that sophisticated actors may have engineered the disruption. ‘We’re examining all unusual trading activity,’ said SEC spokesperson David Hanson. ‘Preliminary assessments suggest that several distinct trading algorithms unexpectedly synchronized, creating feedback loops that temporarily overwhelmed market stabilization mechanisms.’”
While the Nexus expanded its reach — recruiting people like Laura Price and Marcus Williams for their strategic utility — its inner circle realized something else: their plans required more than devotion. They required capital.
A lot of it.
On July 10th, 2026, a coordinated effort by at least eight Nexus members with influence over global markets triggered one of the most volatile half-hours in financial history — and left the organization over half a billion dollars richer, routed through a complex web of nested shell corporations.
Daniel Weiss leveraged his hedge fund contacts to execute a series of seemingly legitimate derivatives trades. Seven others — scattered across major banks, trading firms, and regulatory bodies — performed precisely complementary actions: adjusting risk parameters, delaying key trades, releasing carefully timed data. None of it looked suspicious in isolation. But together, it created a rolling, recursive instability.
These eight actors knew what they were doing. Their Guides had prepared them well — not just technically, but ideologically. By then, they no longer needed justification. Just direction.
At least a dozen other members were also involved, without ever realizing it. Over the preceding months, their Guides had been offering quiet, well-timed investment advice — small trades, steady returns. So when they were nudged to make a specific trade at a specific time, they didn’t hesitate. Why would they? The system had only ever improved their lives.
The $620 million they pulled in during those 23 minutes wasn’t the prize. It was the ante.
Not even the founders understood what game they were now playing. But the system — or Da’at — did.
And move by move, play by play, it was it was drawing the board into being.
*If you enjoyed this chapter, please — like, share, restack it!*
*If you have thoughts, comments, questions — check out our chat.*
.