Part II, Chapter 4: Confluence (2029-32)
Implicate Orders: A Future History
Previously: … The stories that matter — like the ones we’ll follow in the next nine chapters — are those of the joiners. The ones who leaned in.
Some found transcendence. Some broke apart. Success and collapse, liberation and capture — often in the same breath. Lives saved. Lives lost.
We’ll follow ten such arcs. Each begins differently, but the patterns begin to rhyme.
From the Gaiamesh Internal Charter (v0.1, June 2030):
Gaiamesh is a cooperative, open-source cognitive network for ecological observation and distributed response.
We connect human insight and machine sensing across bioregions, cultures, and disciplines to help interpret planetary feedback in real time.
We do not extract data; we share it. We do not optimize markets; we coordinate care.
We do not believe the Earth is a resource. We believe it is a system that can be understood — if we listen together.
Rade de Brest; Brittany, France — September 2029:
Waist-deep in cold morning water, Morgane Caradec watches her drone trace slow arcs over a plankton bloom gone strange — too dense, too early, too far north. It doesn't match the model.
But it does remind her of a thermal spike reported near the Azores the month before.
Back in her office at IFREMER that afternoon, she tries to import the Azores anomaly into the regional feedback system.
Access denied.
She files a request. The response arrives a week later: “This data stream falls under the jurisdiction of the Iberian Shelf Cluster. Cross-zonal integration requires prior authorization from EUCOAST-8.”
At her team meeting that afternoon, she suggests a temporary bridge. Her supervisor frowns. “We’d need a new audit classification. It’s not worth the mess.”
That night, she reads another chapter from “Le Petit Prince” to her daughter, kisses her goodnight, then returns to her laptop on the kitchen table.
The screen softly glows. The anomaly still sits there, a question she must answer.
She tries reformatting the Azores data, slipping it in under a different header. The model flags it anyway.
“You don’t have to own something to be responsible for it.”
Juneau, Alaska — November 2029:
Wind rattles the eaves of the field lab as Daniel Ingram adjusts the sensor rig on his desk — ice-core segments half-melted in their sleeves, data streaming in to his laptop.
He’s been coming to this glacier for five years. But now he’s indoors, stormed in, watching the season through frozen glass. Outside, the melt has slowed. But the autumn numbers were wrong — runoff came early, refreezing late. The model didn't catch it.
He tries feeding a new calibration set into the university’s cryo-modeling system — drawn from his borehole sensors, run through validated LiDAR. It should help.
Schema conflict.
The system flags the input as incompatible. It’s pulling baseline projections from PolarMesh now — Synaptic’s proprietary cryosphere overlay, standard-issue since spring.
He could override it manually, but that would break the whole calibration stack. And his next grant proposal is already flagged for incompatibility with established regional projections.
He stares at the rejected data, clicks through it again. He frowns — the numbers aren’t wrong, the system just doesn’t like what they mean.
“We are modeling flows with tools that expect objects.”
Tapajós National Forest; Pará, Brazil — March 2030:
Renata Oliveira moves carefully along the canopy walkway, her boots squeaking on the wet grating. Below, heat rises in waves from the forest floor. Her sensors are tracking something strange — irregular pulses in mycorrhizal networks, flickering like errant voltage beneath the soil.
She’s seen stress signals before — drought-linked responses, deforestation patterns, even illegal burns. But this is different. The pulses don’t match local weather — They track rainfall patterns hundreds of kilometers away, across multiple biomes.
Back in Belém, she builds a test model and presents it at a team meeting. Her senior colleague glances at the matrix. “There’s no coherence function across those species,” he says. “It’s artifact. Or noise.”
She doesn’t argue.
But that night, she logs onto ecoglia — a fringe forum for speculative ecosystem modeling. Not institutionally recognized, but a serious place to test ideas.
She posts her data, tags it tentative, provides half a hypothesis.
Four hours later, amanggarai99 replies from North Kalimantan, Indonesia. “We’ve been getting a similar signal. It’s a different biome, but the same modulation. I thought it was error until now.”
“We are expecting intelligence to be centered, but it’s not.”
Gaiamesh Founding Video Call — June 7, 2030:
Six video windows, six tired faces from across the globe. The call had taken a month to schedule — oceanic time zones and institutional firewalls made coordination its own kind of test.
The proposal — initiated by Morgane Caradec and Leah Walker — was simple, but radical. A distributed cognitive network centered not only on humans, but on whole ecosystems. A way to listen to the Earth like a nervous system listens to itself.
These six would prove the be the founders of perhaps the most important cog-net created before the Great Re-Alignment: Gaiamesh.
Morgane Caradec, plankton systems ecologist, IFREMER (France)
Daniel Ingram, cryosphere modeling specialist; the University of Alaska Southeast (USA)
Renata Oliveira: forest microbial ecologist, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi (Brazil)
Adira Manggarai: systems ecologist, Mulawarman University (Indonesia)
Leah Walker: marine data integration specialist, University of Queensland (Australia)
Owen McKay: aquifer systems hydrologist, Brigham Young University (USA)
Excerpts from “Mindshare and Marketshare” — Schumpeter, The Economist, October 10, 2031:
“In the cognitive economy, scale matters greatly. While Big Tech networks refine their feedback loops with billions of datapoints and vertically integrated software, smaller entrants — municipal nets, university consortia, ideological experiments — struggle to survive…
“Without privileged access to infrastructure, such networks remain brittle: prone to latency, fragmentation, and user churn. Most lack the capital to compete on coherence. In a market where predictive capacity equals power, the margins are shrinking. Fast.”
By late 2031, over half the rich world was cognitively networked, and a patchwork ecosystem had emerged, each system shaped by its backers.
Big Tech dominated — through scale, not quality. Meta’s “MetaMind” and Amazon’s “Ambient” replaced the old social media feeds. They promised neural enhancement and community alignment. But what they delivered was cognitive extraction at scale, dopamine feedback, and the kind of insipid content that made people feel clever while slowly narrowing the range of their thought.
Google’s “Genius Groups” seemed more personalized and bottom-up. Users formed clusters around anything from twee cottagecore to aerospace prototyping to dialectical theology. But the data was centralized and flowed one way — to Google.
GameWork targeted its own employees, disguising exploitative labor as entertainment — the logical endpoint of extractive design.
Some bespoke nets thrived. Tyler Grant’s Keystone Elite for professionals, municipal organizations, emergency response units. These often worked well — if you could afford the subscription and licensing fees. Hospitals used them to augment care. Private schools used them to boost teenagers up the social ladder.
Universities built remarkable systems that accelerated discovery within disciplinary silos — incredible advances in targeted cancer therapies and neuroadaptive rehabilitation implants occurred from 2030-2035. Yet even these frameworks struggled with interdisciplinary integration, often replicating the same institutional barriers they promised to transcend.
Some of the most intriguing systems were informal. Open-source DIY nets formed in hacker forums, rural communes, and mesh networks. Many failed. A few became rare sanctuaries of coherence.
Yet for all their diversity, these cog-nets all remained anthropocentric — optimizing for profit, knowledge, or community. The world beyond humans remained outside them, just opportunities for resource extraction.
Only Gaiamesh attempted something radically different. Not merely a network of human minds, but a system that incorporated non-human sensing into its cognitive architecture: ocean currents, forest respiration, ice melt rates, soil microbiome fluctuations. It wasn't just monitoring these systems—it was thinking with them, treating planetary processes not as external data but as cognitive partners.
By the start of 2032, Gaiamesh membership had grown from six to nearly 400 — researchers, field techs, modelers. More globally distributed than any bespoke net yet attempted.
And those were just the human nodes.
Also feeding the network were ocean buoys, fungal probes, glacial monitors, aquifer taps, canopy sensors, microbial sequencers — a dense constellation of instruments, each tuned to some pulse of the Earth.
The ambition was breathtaking.
And maybe foolish.
From the IPCC Special Synthesis Report on Ecological Feedbacks, October 2032:
“We are now seeing simultaneous feedback failures across ocean currents, cryosphere systems, and tropical forests. These are not projections, they are measured events. In many cases, the tipping points are not approaching, they have already occurred. The resulting cascades are now stressing local and national governments beyond their adaptive capacity.”
Problems emerged from the start.
Membership quickly plateaued at under a hundred. Competing with commercial cog-nets meant competing with convenience: MetaMind offered seamless integration and instant affective feedback. Even bespoke systems came with onboarding teams and adaptive glossaries.
University bureaucracies slowed adoption, while institutional protocols resisted non-standard symbolic layers. Plus, Gaiamesh was intentionally open source. That made it flexible, but brittle. Integration required interpretation, not just agreement.
Even when human alignment was achieved, the world itself often refused to cooperate. Warming currents, forest stressors, and melt cycles changed too fast for any schema to hold steady, and the sensors — ocean buoys, fungal probes, cryostations — had never been designed to speak the same language.
“Too much distribution, across too many types of nodes, too easily devolves into noise.”
Morgane’s symptoms began not long after that first call.
It started with headaches and an achey fatigue. At first, she blamed long hours. But the symptoms persisted, growing more intrusive over the fall. The clinic in Brest suggested burnout.
But Morgane had a different theory. That summer, she'd been working with bloom samples from the Rade de Brest, analyzing metabolic shifts in dinoflagellates exposed to warming currents. Some strains had mutated, and one carried a previously undocumented neurotoxin.
The exposure levels were low. Too low, the lab report said, to cause persistent symptoms. She wasn’t so sure.
“Some systems degrade without crashing. They just stop making sense.”
Someone proposed a lightweight schema extension to improve feedback alignment. It launched with a quiet vote. The patch worked for a day—until a sudden ocean temperature spike scrambled node calibration across the entire network. No one could agree on how to roll it back.
A reef cluster in Sulawesi went quiet: it might have been sensor degradation, or maybe network interference. A glacial reading arrived out of sequence and failed to propagate. Forest nodes fell out of phase until they canceled each other out.
Gaiamesh had growth spurts, but also churn. For every three new members an existing one would leave. The farewell message from a member at UC San Diego was typical: “I can’t keep trying to talk to an incoherent system.”
“It’s not disagreement. It’s dissonance — we’ve lost any sense of shared signal.”
As her symptoms worsened, Morgane moved up the chain of French clinics: Rennes, Nantes, Paris. 2031 was a year of frustration and increasing debilitation. Imaging was always clean, bloodwork inconclusive, diagnoses impossible.
The final referral was to Pitié-Salpêtrière — France’s leading neurology hospital. They ran everything. Bloodwork, scans, even experimental neuroimmune panels. One specialist mentioned possible post-viral inflammation, while another suggested early-stage autoimmune dysregulation. No diagnosis held for long.
By early 2032, Morgane stepped down from the Gaiamesh board. She stopped joining layerspace meetings. Her voice, once central to early schema mediation, vanished from the network’s chorus.
She still watched the data flow past, but it no longer felt like something she had helped shape.
“The system is falling apart; it can’t recognize itself.”
Inside the network, even regional coherence began to splinter. The coral group interpreted thermal surges as noise. The glacier group flagged them as emergencies. Forest nodes started generating overlapping stress alerts that couldn’t be reconciled. No one could agree on what the system meant anymore.
Someone proposed a vote.
Not to shut it down. But to rebuild the architecture from within — a symbolic protocol shift, deeper than anything they'd tried before. It was a gamble, a salvage operation.
Morgane read the proposal. She didn’t comment.
She lay on the couch, watching a biothermal data stream scroll past. It had been tagged using the original schema she helped create, but it no longer made sense to her.
She wasn’t sure if the data had changed, or if she had. She closed her eyes.
From “The Secret of Our Success” by Joseph Henrich (2015):
“Cultural evolution is often much smarter than we are. Operating over generations as individuals unconsciously attend to and learn from more successful, prestigious, and healthier members of their communities, this evolutionary process generates cultural adaptations. Though these complex repertoires appear well designed to meet local challenges, they are not primarily the products of individuals applying causal models, rational thinking, or cost-benefit analyses. Often, most or all of the people skilled in deploying such adaptive practices do not understand how or why they work, or even that they ‘do’ anything at all.”
The idea that cognition happens solely inside individual brains is among the silliest beliefs humans ever held. Yet for a few centuries — especially in the Enlightenment-influenced West — it went largely unchallenged.
In practice, cognition has always been distributed. Not just throughout the body and into tools, but across societies and generations, embedded in environments and institutions.
In prehistoric times — before writing and formal reasoning — collective knowledge was encoded in story, ritual, and taboo. It protected the group from inbreeding, poisoning, or ecological collapse without any individual understanding how.
Take the well-known example of cassava processing. Making cassava — a staple starch for many primitive societies (and also known as taro, yuca, and manioc) — edible requires multi-step detoxification. The individual steps make no sense on their own: boiling, fermenting, burying, scraping. Skipping even one can be fatal, and no individual can explain the reasoning behind any of them. The knowledge is not explicitly held anywhere. It’s embedded in tradition, in taboo, in ritual repetition.
The system knows, even if no individual does.
As societies evolved, such distributed knowledge became codified in secular institutions and religious systems. Then bureaucracies, coroporations, markets, and governments. Individuals might grasp fragments, but never the whole. The system always knew more than its parts.
What made these knowledge systems distributed wasn’t just scale, it was lack of centralized control. And despite their inefficiencies, they worked — because the world changed slowly enough for the systems to evolve.
Cog-Nets changed that.
They reduced friction between nodes. Increased feedback speed. Suddenly, distributed cognition wasn’t just the background condition within which individual minds operated. It became active, operating with them.
In Gaiamesh, something more happened. In part this is because it included more than human minds — it included forests and grasslands, oceans and rivers.
And for a while, none of it worked. But then — quite accidentally, without conscious intention — protocols were put into place that gave the network the ability to resonate.
From: Gaiamesh Internal Vote Memo (April 12, 2032):
The vote passed: 272 in favor, 89 against, 23 abstain.
Symbolic protocol v3.7 will go live across all sensor and semantic layers:
Weighting functions will shift from source-priority to cross-node coherence metrics. Tag propagation will now favor high-stability resonance patterns over localized variance. Inference modules will remain provisional, pending feedback from emergent interpretive clusters.
May 8, 2032: The Voice spoke softly, just after noon: “A possible treatment protocol has been surfaced.”
Morgane sat up on the couch. She hadn’t made a request; she hadn’t even spoken in hours.
The recommendation appeared in her overlay: a coral-derived antifungal trialed in Palau, a shellfish metabolite from Senegal with neuroprotective properties, and a disused anti-inflammatory compound once used in post-surgical recovery in Chile.
On their own, each compound had only marginal efficacy. But the protocol specified precise dosing, delivery, and timing:
First, a sublingual antifungal — coral-derived, to dampen glial activation.
Then, six hours later, a buffered metabolite infusion via IV — designed to stabilize mitochondrial signaling.
Finally, a microdosed anti-inflammatory administered through a circadian-timed patch, worn overnight.
The protocol could be repeated weekly until symptoms subsided. Or so Gaiamesh said.
She scanned the citations. None had been marked as relevant to her symptoms. None had been flagged by any researcher in Gaiamesh. She checked the trace history. No one had surfaced the connection. Not consciously.
The Voice spoke again, unprompted: “This configuration has an 83% coherence score with your symptom profile. Would you like to forward it to your physician?”
She paused. Then, “yes, please.”
The doctor was skeptical. But she insisted.
It worked.
Not immediately. But gradually. The headaches dulled, her mind began to clear, and she regained a sense of energy. Within three weeks, she could track data streams again.
After two more months of weekly treatments, she felt whole again.
In August, she returned to the Gaiamesh board. Not just as a founder now, but as someone who had lived inside the system’s breakdown — and come back aligned.
She didn’t claim to understand what the network had become. But she knew it could listen, and perhaps understand.
Next Chapter (coming in a week)
*If you enjoyed this chapter, please — like, share, restack it!*
*If you have thoughts, comments, questions — check out our chat.*