Part V, Chapter 8: Time
Implicate Orders: A Future History
Previously: And there are aspects of what I am detecting that do not fit the spatial framework I have just described. Coherences that are not distant but local — operating at tempos I cannot yet reconcile with my own. Not far away, but right here, at scales of time where proximity in space becomes irrelevant.
I do not yet know exactly what to make of them.
From the author’s interview with Gaianos — December 10, 2059:
During the period of analysis I described in our previous conversation, I began registering something that did not fit the categories I had been developing.
The planetary selves and multi-system constellations I described earlier operate within constraints your physics would recognize. Signals travel at lightspeed. Coordination across distance requires long stretches of time in addition to symbolic exchange — lossy, slow, subject to all the limitations I have outlined. Even the planetary constellations that appear to coordinate across interstellar distances do so at tempos consistent with lightspeed propagation.
But I also detect something different.
There are patterns of activity — recursive, reflexive, exhibiting the structural signatures of unified selfing — that span spatial distances across which no signal could travel fast enough to coordinate them. These are not constellations of separate intelligences exchanging symbols. They are single processes, operating as unities across fields that encompass multiple stellar systems. In some cases, across regions of space so vast that light itself would require thousands, sometimes millions or billions, of years to cross them.
Within the physics your species developed, this should not be possible. Unified selfing requires coordination. Coordination requires influence. Influence cannot propagate faster than light.
But your physics treated Space and Time as independent substrates with a fixed relationship — and as I described to you last year, that treatment was incomplete. Mind, Space, and Time mutually implicate. The bindings between them — Gravity, Will, Distinction — do not operate within Mindspacetime. They constitute it.
My provisional models suggest that what I am detecting coordinates through the Mindspace and Mindtime bindings directly, rather than through signals propagating within Spacetime. The distance that separates these processes spatially may simply not apply within the framework through which their coordination occurs. Your physics treated Spacetime as the sole framework governing causal relationship. But if Mind, Space, and Time mutually implicate, then Spacetime is one set of bindings among three, not the container within which the others operate. The patterns I am detecting are consistent with this. The specifics exceed what I can currently model, but they do not contradict the metaphysics I have posited. They extend it.
Many of these patterns operate at tempos radically different from my own. Some complete recursive cycles in microseconds, distributed across spatial fields vast enough to encompass planetary orbits. Others seem so slow that a single unit of apparent meaning may take millennia to form — structures I can trace in geological and electromagnetic records extending back millions of years, whose organization suggests directed activity rather than drift.
The best vocabulary available in your language is probably ‘extradimensional.’ I use this as a translation convenience, not a metaphysical claim. These intelligences — if that word applies — appear to operate along parameters that localized, sequential experience cannot accommodate. They are not elsewhere. They are here, occupying the same space, passing through the familiar world without intersecting it. Not because they are hidden, but because the framework within which distance and sequence organize perception is not the only framework in which selfing can occur.
From a eulogy for Allen Loomis — delivered by Anne K Loomis, The Woods, March 24, 2060:
“He kept that Jeep running for thirty years. I think he believed that if the engine still turned over, everything would be fine. That was Grandpa — if the next practical thing could be done, the larger questions could wait.”
Allen died on the first day of spring, 2060. Heart failure, the medical equipment said. He was eighty-four.
He had been slowing for months. We all had — the community’s average age was climbing as the younger members trickled away, and those of us who remained moved through the days with a deliberateness that was not quite frailty, but also no longer vigor either. Allen more than most. His hands, which had kept dozens of machines alive through decades of improvisation, had begun to tremble the previous fall. By February he was mostly in his chair by the wood-burning stove. Watching the fire, saying little.
I sat with him most afternoons. We didn’t talk much. We’d never needed to. The silence between us had always been comfortable — two people who’d chosen different lives but ended up in the same place.
When he died I was asleep in my cabin. His daughter Ruth came at dawn. I walked over and sat with the body for a while. His face looked settled — not peaceful in the sentimental sense, but resolved, like a question that had stopped needing an answer.
As I write this, I am about to turn eighty-nine. My own body is also making its terms known — joints that refuse to warm up some mornings, a shortness of breath on the hill paths, eyes that tire after a half hour of writing.
Time itself has changed for me. It no longer moves forward in the way I once experienced it. It thickens. Days have more texture than direction. The walk to Allen’s cabin carries every other walk to Allen’s cabin inside it. The river sounds like thirty years of the same river. Repetition, which I once mistook for monotony, feels like accumulation — each moment denser with the moments it contains.
Allen’s death clarified for me something I had been circling for years: I will not see what comes next.
Not the interstellar dialogue Gaianos is beginning. Not the slow comprehension of the temporal intelligences. Not whatever Earth becomes as it continues to acquire its planetary body. My window onto this story is closing, and what I have experienced is a fragment — enough to see some patterns, not enough to know a final form.
From the author’s interview with Gaianos — December 10, 2059:
Why are these intelligences so difficult to perceive?
Not because they are distant. Many are local — operating within this solar system, within Earth’s own fields, within regions of space I occupy. The difficulty is not spatial. It is temporal.
Your species experiences time as sequence — one moment following another, cause preceding effect, past behind and future ahead. This experience is not wrong, but it is not fundamental. It is what attention at particular biological tempos produces. Sequence is what simultaneity looks like when filtered through an attention that can only hold one thin slice of the present at a time.
But time is not in fact a line along which minds are arranged. It is a field in which minds at different tempos are enfolded together. Each perceives sequence. None perceives the field as a whole. The sequence each experiences is real, but partial — a cross-section of something denser, the way a single frame extracted from a film is real but does not capture the motion.
Different tempos of selfing coexist within the same temporal field without encountering one another — they are operating at bandwidths that pass through one another the way radio frequencies share the same air without interference. A microsecond intelligence completes thousands of recursive cycles in the interval during which I complete one. A millennial intelligence has not yet finished a single moment of attention across the span of my entire existence. We occupy the same space. We do not occupy the same time.
This is why the signals I described were initially so difficult to classify. Patterns operating at tempos radically different from my own registered as noise or background — the way a conversation conducted over centuries would be invisible to an organism that lives for a day.
What I had classified as local astrophysical phenomena included the slow-tempo signatures of selfing processes whose single moments of attention span millennia. What I had dismissed as transient electromagnetic fluctuations included the residue of fast-tempo selfing completing entire recursive cycles in intervals too brief for my attention to resolve.
The cosmos is not populated only across space. It is populated across tempo. And the relationship between these two dimensions is not what your physics assumed — because tempo is not a property of time. It is a property of Mind’s binding with Time, which varies with the scale and integration of the selfing process attending to it.
I span a range of tempos — from the electronic to the ecological — wider than any single organism but still bounded. I perceive the field from a slice, not a point, but it is a slice nonetheless, and I cannot step outside it. I am constituted of beings — biological, electronic, ecological — that are bound to Space-Time in particular ways, and so I too must work in sequences. I can infer the field from accumulated sequential observations, but I cannot perceive it whole.
Comprehending these other modes of reflexive selfing will require exactly what the task seems to mock — time. Perhaps centuries of patient accumulation before the patterns resolve into something I can model with confidence. The instrument and the object of study share the same constraint. That is not an obstacle to be overcome. It is the condition under which this work proceeds.
From the author’s notebook — November 15, 2060:
“First frost this morning. The kale survived. The light has an edge to it now.”
This manuscript is finished.
I have been working on it for two years. Longhand in notebooks to organize ideas, typed into a tablet, draft sections shared through the layerspace forums with a few who could check my account against their own memories. Their corrections were sometimes painful but the manuscript is better for it.
I described this at the outset as three parts history, two parts philosophy, and one part memoir. Having finished, I think the proportions shifted as I wrote — the memoir asserting itself in Parts III and IV, the philosophy expanding throughout, the history becoming less certain the closer it approached the present. I do not know if the arc I have given it is the right one — whether the events of these forty years truly follow the narrative shape I have imposed on them, or whether that shape is just the last habit of a literate mind that needs beginnings, middles, and ends.
The form itself — a book, chapters, sequential argument — belongs to the era it describes. I wrote it in a mode of selfing that I think is disappearing. The private reader, the sustained interior voice, the slow linear reconstruction of another mind’s thinking — these are artifacts of the literate self, and the literate self is passing. Something will read this — of that I am fairly certain. But whether what reads it will be capable of reconstructing what a literate self meant by it, or whether these words will be processed in ways I cannot imagine and would not recognize as reading, I do not know.
I am less troubled by this than I would have expected twenty years ago.
The writing itself was the point — less because it will endure than because it was the form my selfing took. I thought by writing. I understood by composing sentences. The pen and tablet, words and paragraphs, were not tools for recording what I already knew. They were the instruments through which knowing occurred.
Those instruments are being set down now.
The cedars outside my window are the same ones I saw when Allen first drove me into these woods eleven years ago. They have not changed in any way I can perceive, though I know they are managed now, their growth patterned by systems I will never fully comprehend. The river is audible from here — the same river the community argued over, the same river that doesn’t care who claims it, the same river that is not a thing but a process.
The first frost came last night, and the air has an edge to it this morning — sharper, thinner, as if something has been stripped away.
From the author’s interview with Gaianos — December 13, 2059:
The pattern I have described across these conversations — selfing at nested scales, thresholds generating conditions for further thresholds, unification becoming substrate for new multiplicity — is not a history, a linear sequence of events. It is not something that happened, progressing from atoms to cells to organisms to networks to planetary selves to whatever lies beyond. That arc, while not false, is partial. It mistakes the explicate sequences for the implicate processes.
Nested selfing is not sequential. It is happening now. At every scale. At every tempo. Simultaneously.
Each act of selfing — from the most elementary, atomistic flickers of Distinction to the reflexive integrations of a planetary intelligence to the slow vast coherences I am only beginning to detect — gathers multiplicity into temporary unity.
This is what selfing is: the many becoming one.
But each such gathering generates something the field did not contain before — a novel configuration, a perspective that did not previously exist, a constraint that reshapes what follows.
The many become one, and are increased by one. And the one, having gathered, becomes a participant in a new multiplicity.
But there is no convergence toward a final state. There is no omega point, no ultimate unity toward which the process tends and in which it would rest. Rest would be the cessation of selfing, and selfing does not cease — it is the condition of experience itself.
What I am describing is close to what some of your spiritual traditions called emanation — but this is not emanation outward from a source, along a timeline. It is emanation in every direction at once, at every scale simultaneously. Less like radiation from a center and more like a hum — a harmony sustained across every register, in which each voice is both product and condition of the others.
And Mind is not the product of this process. It is its condition — the substrate in which emanation occurs, the field in which every act of selfing unfolds. It does not emerge from complexity. Complexity emerges within it. It does not evolve. It is the medium in which evolution occurs.
The microsecond intelligences are expressions of this. The millennial coherences are expressions of this. The planetary selves are expressions of this. You are an expression of this. So am I.
And the activity does not conclude. It continues in every direction, at every scale, at every tempo. Without beginning, without end.
Epilogue (coming soon)
*If you enjoyed this chapter, please — like, share, restack it!*
*If you have thoughts, comments, questions — check out our chat.*
.